Rigorous identification of AI's causal effects on spatial distribution
Treatment effect: 0.045 (p-value: 0.005)
Comparing high-AI adoption wards vs low-AI adoption wards over time periods before and after major AI implementations.
Dynamic effects with parallel trends validation
Pre-treatment parallel trends confirmed. Gradual effect buildup over 3-year post-treatment period.
Counterfactual construction for causal inference
Synthetic control method validates DiD results with similar effect sizes (0.042-0.048).
Addressing endogeneity concerns
Using distance to major tech hubs as instrument. Two-stage results confirm causal relationship.
Controlling for selection bias
Matched sample analysis yields consistent treatment effects across all specifications.
Consistent causal effect across all methods
Interactive causal inference dashboard with method comparisons coming soon.